Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Orphans of Bleak House


The orphaned children of Bleak House portrayed throughout this portion of the reading as nothing more than abused and neglected children.  Dickens uses the metaphor of English society as an absent parent as way for us as the reader to understand the abuse and abandonment of its children.  Bleak House is full of orphaned and brave children not to mention bad parenting. We can begin with, for example, the orphan Jo.  Jo tells us the lodger was very “good” to him.   Although he is shown rare acts of kindness, I can’t help but see that this poor child belongs nowhere.  People are constantly telling him to move on; I could not feel compassion for him.  Here is a boy who has lost his parents as well as the only person who even came close to being a parent and the people of London show now regard t for his well being.  England or shall I say society has shoved into what I say into a life of abuse and neglect by living in the streets.  Jo’s life on the streets is one of harsh conditions as well as not safe.  Dickens portrays him as boy who seems himself as animal living on very little food along with no real shelter.  Dickens use of Jo to highlight the treatment of the children in London society and provides us with an understanding of how children were not viewed as ward of the state and should be taken care of, but rather a sad reminder of the socioeconomic issues plaguing England at the time.

Another example of courageous and orphaned children are the Necketts.  These children are prime illustration of how society has failed.  Their mother died after the birth of the youngest and later the father passes.  I found this chapter very disturbing in terms of how these children were forced to live after losing their parents.  The eldest Charley having being forced to find work at age 13 and forced to take less than what was given normally because her father was a follerer."  This poor child has had to become a woman.  Her younger brother Tom is also a victim of society since he is forced to become a babysitter for the baby.  When asked what she does, Charley answers with pride that she does laundry to provide for her family.  Dickens is doing something interesting with this in that he seems to be resisting the idea society has about its children.  He is saying there are not little savages lurking in dark alleys waiting to accost someone.  Nor are they a drain on society itself, but productive and resourceful members of a population turning its back on them.  These children were failed by the social injustice that was plaguing England in the Victorian Era. 

2 comments:

  1. I really like your discussion of English society as a metaphor for an absent parent. So few of the characters engage in true charity, but as we discussed in class, people still rely on the underclasses--they need them--even as they take them for granted.

    I find the story about the Necketts to be disturbing too. What's even more disturbing is that there were thousands of children living in the same or similar conditions during the Victorian era. It's nice to see people like Jarndyce come to the aid of the poor, but in reality, the problem was so big that random acts of kindness weren't nearly enough. Dickens' relentless focus on the failure of society or social systems to address poverty marks many of his novels.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I understand what you are saying mostly but I was curious as to how you don't feel compassion for Jo, of all the situations he has been in he still keeps going which is saying a lot more for him than a lot of the other characters who seem to just give up when a difficult situation comes their way. For example when things get hard for Richard he just changes courses. I can't help but feel compassion for this poor Jo because he seems to try so hard to fit somewhere and nobody will accept him being there they just tell him to move on. Just move on Jo.

    ReplyDelete